gdkelebbs 发表于 2009-9-1 05:55:16

tom 发表于 2009-9-1 06:06:08

让 Turing 帮你ping 一下

Turing 发表于 2009-9-1 07:05:38

PING 77.72.169.14 (77.72.169.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=184 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=238 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=5 ttl=238 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=6 ttl=238 time=189 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=7 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=8 ttl=238 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=9 ttl=238 time=216 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=10 ttl=238 time=187 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=11 ttl=238 time=267 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=12 ttl=238 time=155 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=13 ttl=238 time=196 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=14 ttl=238 time=191 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=15 ttl=238 time=199 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=16 ttl=238 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=17 ttl=238 time=200 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=18 ttl=238 time=193 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=19 ttl=238 time=199 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=20 ttl=238 time=161 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=21 ttl=238 time=197 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=22 ttl=238 time=196 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=23 ttl=238 time=195 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=24 ttl=238 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 77.72.169.14: icmp_seq=25 ttl=238 time=200 ms

--- 77.72.169.14 ping statistics ---
25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 23985ms

gdkelebbs 发表于 2009-9-1 10:24:27

Turing 发表于 2009-9-1 10:42:22

24小时

gdkelebbs 发表于 2009-9-1 11:11:17

cpuer 发表于 2009-9-1 11:51:23

回复 6# 的帖子

:victory: :victory:

Turing 发表于 2009-9-1 12:42:07

不知道99美圆的E5200 和149美圆的Q9300性能上差距有多大？

cpuer 发表于 2009-9-1 13:01:10

回复 8# 的帖子

PE5200比E6550还差些，虽都属双核。
Q9300相对比较强，四核心架构。

我找下benchmark，仅供参考。

Turing 发表于 2009-9-1 13:08:27

恩，但价格毕竟相差50美金呢。。。
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: PacificRack服务器 访问荷兰的速度如何？