求个确切翻译.

ATOM

Regarding the way I operate:

Certain things are "dedicated" and certain things are "fair share". CPU resources and bandwidth resources are provided "fair share".

The host nodes have a 100 or 200Mbps (bonded) connection to the core routers. Thus, while each customer obviously can't burst... if each customer used an average rate over the month... they would be able to fully utilize their bandwidth without slow down.

In other words, if I give a plan 320GB of transfer, I equate that to about 2Mbps of sustained average use bandwidth. Thus, I would be able to support 50 to 100 of such customers (considering bandwidth alone) on a host machine. Of course, in reality... I also have to make certain that the CPU usage while provided "fair share" does not get to where nodes are starving for resources.

In general, there are a lot more resources available than provided. Of all the VPS accounts provided... only about 2 use over 50% of their bandwidth allotment a month. Most are far less than 25%.

---
Also,

That link you provided doesn't work for me, so I'm uncertain what it's supposed to show.

qiqi13245

原帖由 wske 于 2010-8-3 10:29 发表
很简单，言下之意就是你占用的资源太多了。从他的语气看，你应该占用了过多的带宽资源吧。

或者这只是他的一个举例，不知道你之前和他说的到底是什么？争论什么是独立资源，什么是共享资源么？

其实即便是100tb宣传的独享带宽， ...

ccp

关于我们是怎样运转的：

有些资源是独立分配给客户，但象CPU和宽带是共享的。

母鸡有100或者200mbps的独立宽带，所以显然不可能所有用户都同时占满宽带。假如所有用户都非常均匀地使用他们所分配到的流量，那么所有用户都能充分利用他们的宽带也不至于影响速度。

换句话说，假如有个套餐是320GB流量的，也就是相当于平均2mbps宽带，那么我可以在母鸡上放50～100个小鸡。当然，现实中，CPU资源会不够用。。

一般情况吓，母鸡上的资源是供大于求的。我们提供的VPS中，只有两个使用的宽带超过了50%的月流量限额，远远低于25％。

还有，你提供的连接有问题。不知道你想表达什么。